Imitation or inspiration?

  • Advertising
  • October 26, 2010
  • Ben Fahy
Imitation or inspiration?

There's always plenty of discussion in the ad industry as to where the line between plagiarism and creative inspiration is drawn. TV3 has felt the cool accusatory breeze a couple of times this year with some of its promotional work. And, after Colenso discovered two of its Vodafone commercials were eerily similar to overseas numbers, planning director James Hurman wrote an excellent piece entitled Casualties of Coincidence in Idealog that explained how similar ideas tend to emerge at the same time from different places. Mumbrella also recently put together a great collection of Australia's 20 best copy cat ads. And while it's debatable whether anyone outside the marcomms bubble (ie the intended recipients of the commercial messages) actually cares whether an idea or an ad has been modified for a different market, especially in an age where the mash-up is King and online YouTube homage is common place, I couldn't help but notice this article in the August edition of Wired magazine about an experiment called PacManhattan, which used the streets of Greenwich Village for a real-world version of PacMan back in 2004. Sound familiar?

Youtube Video

Away from whether Saatchi & Saatchi's recent Telecom spot for its 2500 text deal is a copy-cat or a homage, the crux of the Wired story, which talks to one of the men behind both the real-life PacMan event and Foursquare, is very interesting from a marketing perspective. Social media is often criticised for leading to a rather oxymoronic dearth of real-world socialising, but mobile/digital tools and new location-based networks like Foursquare now mean these two worlds are starting to converge. And, as this article in Ad Age shows, such developments could soon lead to a kind of virtual reality bun fight to try and attract customers.

This is a community discussion forum. Comment is free but please respect our rules:

  1. Don’t be abusive or use sweary type words
  2. Don’t break the law: libel, slander and defamatory comments are forbidden
  3. Don’t resort to name-calling, mean-spiritedness, or slagging off
  4. Don’t pretend to be someone else.

If we find you doing these things, your comments will be edited without recourse and you may be asked to go away and reconsider your actions.
We respect the right to free speech and anonymous comments. Don’t abuse the privilege.

Wish I was there: Contiki's quid-pro-quo approach to working with influencers

  • Advertising
  • October 27, 2016
  • Erin McKenzie
Wish I was there: Contiki's quid-pro-quo approach to working with influencers

Social media stars and influencers are so hot right now, with brands across the world paying sometimes eye-watering sums to have nouveau celebs promote their products. And while this is something of a recent fad, 54-year-old Contiki built its brand on this approach long before it became fashionable. We talk to marketing director Tony Laskey about its latest influencer based campaigns, building relationships and why influencers work so well for Contiki.

Read more
Next page
Results for

StopPress provides essential industry news and intelligence, updated daily. And the digital newsletter delivers the latest news to your inbox twice a week — for free!

©2009–2015 Tangible Media. All rights reserved.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Privacy policy.


Contact Vernene Medcalf at +64 21 628 200 to advertise in StopPress.

View Media Kit