Stuff vs NZ Herald: battle for mobile eyes becomes closer after Nielsen fix

  • Didge
  • May 29, 2014
  • Damien Venuto
Stuff vs NZ Herald: battle for mobile eyes becomes closer after Nielsen fix

APN recently sent out a release pointing out that Nielsen had been undercounting audience to the Herald’s mobile site for about nine months—meaning that the battle for mobile eyes was inadvertently skewed in favour of Stuff.  

“Due to a coding error resulting from changes made to the mobile site, traffic to the site has been undercounted," says Nielsen comms manager Kim McFadden.  

“The mobile site and brand were incorrectly reported within Nielsen Market Intelligence from 30 July 2013 to 14 April 2014, [but] the correction has been applied and is effective from 15 April 2014.”

The Herald’s chief marketing officer Kursten Shalfoon welcomed the correction and pointed out how significant the difference was.    

“After nine months of incorrect reporting it’s great to see our audience accurately represented to the market. We’ve been heavily investing in our digital products and instinctively knew we were doing better than the numbers said. It’s satisfying to see the Herald’s unduplicated reach increasing by six percent compared to March 2014.”

While the correction has given the Herald a bump in the right direction, the publication still lags behind Stuff in terms of mobile visitors.  

For the month of May (which has accurate statistics for both publications), Stuff received a daily average of 121,273 unique browsers while the Herald attracted 103,398 pairs of eyes.

When the statistics were broken down into iOS and Android users, they showed Stuff leading in both instances, albeit to a lesser degree with Android users. 

Of those who visited Stuff in May, 97,000 used an Apple product while 76,800 used Android-powered devices. At the Herald, the split also leaned in favour of iOS, with 86,000 visiting the website with an Apple product, while 72,600 used an Android smartphone.

This is a community discussion forum. Comment is free but please respect our rules:

  1. Don’t be abusive or use sweary type words
  2. Don’t break the law: libel, slander and defamatory comments are forbidden
  3. Don’t resort to name-calling, mean-spiritedness, or slagging off
  4. Don’t pretend to be someone else.

If we find you doing these things, your comments will be edited without recourse and you may be asked to go away and reconsider your actions.
We respect the right to free speech and anonymous comments. Don’t abuse the privilege.

Whittaker's divides the court of public opinion – but all for a good cause

  • Advertising
  • February 22, 2019
  • Caitlin Salter
Whittaker's divides the court of public opinion – but all for a good cause

On Monday, Whittaker’s launched its latest novelty chocolate-lolly mash up with a chocolatey answer to retro bakesale treat coconut ice. The Coconut Ice Surprise chocolate has a twist though, 20c from each block goes to Plunket – a charity which New Zealanders agree is a worthy cause. However, to relate the chocolate to the charity, Whittaker's has built the campaign around baby gender reveal parties, causing a backlash from the public who argue gender norms have expanded beyond blue for boys and pink for girls.

Read more
Next page
Results for

StopPress provides essential industry news and intelligence, updated daily. And the digital newsletter delivers the latest news to your inbox twice a week — for free!

©2009–2019 ICG Media. All rights reserved.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Privacy policy.


Contact Vernene Medcalf at +64 21 628 200 to advertise in StopPress.

View Media Kit